MetaStock™ Zone Forum & FAQ Artykuły Linki Elliott Waves EasyLanguage™ Zone

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P R S T U V W Y Z #

Ehlers Filters by John Ehlers
More PREV Stuff

To: "MetaStock List" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: More PREV Stuff
From: "C.S." <csaxe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:11:37 -0800
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Just when I thought that I was beginning to figure out Metastock formula language, the following was listed in Apr 01 TASC Traders' Tips as the solution to Ehler's nonlinear filter article. The first one is easy to figure out from the article.


Ehlers Filter


ti:= 15;
pr:= MP();
coef:= Abs(pr - Ref(pr,-5));
Sum(coef*pr,ti)/Sum(coef,ti)

 

This one works, but has me stumped as to how it works according to the article. You really have to read the article to understand what is being calculated here.

 


Distant Coefficient Ehlers Filter

ti:= 15;
pr:= MP();
coef:=Sum(Power(Ref(LastValue(pr+PREV-PREV)-pr,-1),2),ti);
Sum(coef*pr,ti)/Sum(coef,ti)

 

e-w-Ehlers_Filters.gif
The two PREV would appear to be just adding a number and then subtracting a number, leaving "pr" but that isn't the case. The formulas were written by Cheryl Abram of Equis. It would be nice if someone at Equis would consider having her give a us a quick class on how this works and other formula construction tips.

I came up with:

ti:=15;
pr:=MP();
coef:=Sum(Power(LastValue(pr)-Ref(pr,-1),2),ti);
Sum(coef*pr,ti)/Sum(coef,ti)

This works too, but doesn't follow rapid price changes as quickly as Cheryl's formula.

Any ideas on how the two PREV act together?

-Corey

[1240]

Re: More PREV Stuff
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: More PREV Stuff
From: "C.S." <csaxe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:49:04 -0800
References: 003701c0b3c4$b46edc20$059117d0@xxxxx
<001001c0b3c9$f7ffaaa0$d892fea9@xxxxxx>
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Yes, I realize that, but addition and subtraction is on the same precedence level. However I assume that (pr+PREV-PREV) should be the same as (pr), because Ref(LastValue(pr+PREV-PREV)-pr,-1) = Ref(LastValue(pr-PREV+PREV)-pr,-1).

In examining the equation, I found another interesting phenomena,

pr:=CLOSE;
Ref(LastValue(pr+PREV-PREV)-pr,-1)

Is not the same as:

Ref(LastValue(CLOSE+PREV-PREV)-CLOSE,-1)

Even though

Ref(LastValue(C)-C,-1) = Ref(LastValue(pr)-pr,-1)

and

LastValue(pr+PREV-PREV)-pr = LastValue(C+PREV-PREV)-C

.....the "plot" thickens....

-Corey

[1250]

Source / From: TOP
http://purebytes.com/archives/metastock/

Equis and MetaStock® and MetaStock Professional® are registered trademarks of Equis International. Achelis Binary Wave®, The DownLoader®,
Expert Advisor®, OptionScope®, Quotecenter® and Smart Charts® are trademarks of Equis International, a Thomson Reuters company.

TradeStation® Pro, TradeStation® 2000i, OptionStation®, SuperCharts®, PowerEditor® and EasyLanguage®
are registered trademarks of TradeStation Technologies, Inc. Other names and marks referred to are the property of their respective owners.

All information provided on this website is for educational purposes only. Trading involves risk, including possible loss of principal and other losses.

Ten i inne materiały na tej stronie zostały zamieszczone zostały jedynie w celach edukacyjnych, nie ponoszę żadnej odpowiedzialno¶ci za ich stosowanie.

Gra na giełdzie i rynkach walutowych (FOREX) niesie ze sob± ryzyko poważnych strat finansowych!